Answer Upon
#1 in Business Subscribe Email Print

You are here: Home > Self Improvement > Spirituality > Lessons for Life: THE CREATION

Tags

  • goods
  • gospel
  • first
  • technologies during
  • their times
  • earth bring

  • Links

  • Best Kept Secret of Bestseller Writing
  • How to Make this Year's Reunion Your Best Ever
  • New Year, New You? People Spend More Time Planning Their 2 Week Vacation
  • Answer Upon - Lessons for Life: THE CREATION

    Are Paid Surveys A Scam?
    The Web has granted the research firms a more efficient way of collecting data. So, many market research firms now conduct legitimate, online paid surveys and other types of paid, online marketing research.But many questionable, "middleman" paid surveys scam sites are spreading a bad name by promising easy money for participating in online marketing research from home.When there's competition for selling an easy-money- working-from-home scheme, you can bet that there's also exaggeration, if not outright paid surveys scam.If anybody is earning money from online paid surveys, it's highly probable that it is one of the numerous paid surveys scam sites. Of the 60 plus paid survey sites reviewed, most "pay" only token rewards in the form of goods, services, coupons or samples. Many pay cash only through sweepstakes. Even if you're lucky enough to win several sweepstakes, it likely won't lead to early retirement.Prizes at most reviewed sites range from $50-$2,000 in cash or goods and drawings are only occasional. Some pay with points that are redeemable for cash or goods. Typically, you must rack up a bunch to redeem them for anything of significance.For example a big company will hire a market research company to get this information from them. Each market research company has an online panel. The company may want to survey 5,000 women who match the demographics the company is seeking to market their product to. The research company then emails all of its online panelists and invites them to participate in the study. Each member fills out a short qualifying survey to see if the fit the profile they are looking for. If they do they are asked to participate in an online survey and told they will be paid on completing the survey.People are also tricked into paying up
    ic arguments are used, as they often are. Stretching science is to be avoided. (Especially in thermodynamics. Some don't seem to know about nonequilibrium thermodynamics, etc.) Accepting truth when proved is integrity.

    Science has not unraveled the creation of the universe in great detail. In fact, the history of science is full of false precepts and conclusions.

    That's what science is all about.

    You take a guess at what you think is right. You call it a hypotheses.

    You test your guess. If lots of data make your guess look good, you call it a theory. You realize that your theory can never be proven, but if more and more data fits, you are happy with the theory. Many theories have held for many years, only to be abandoned when the data (facts) didn't fit.

    Religion also had a history of false precepts and conclusions. Poor Galileo was right in his science but wrong in his religion. He paid dearly for that. The problem is that his church had false precepts about the universe, having thought they knew exactly what God had done. They didn't. They had to change, just as science has to change. Men are not all that smart about everything. They ju

    Home Business PC Security for the Non-Technical
    The Internet is a powerful tool for home-based businesses.If used effectively, it can be your best friend; but if you don’t secure your computer, it can be your worst enemy. I’m sure you’ve had your fill of warnings about the latest killer computer virus. So I’m not going to harp on about the latest threat, or the potential for damage. What I WILL do is provide some protection tips and links for the layperson.And now for the obligatory disclaimer: I’m no tech-head – I’m an advertising copywriter and website copywriter. So this article is certainly not definitive or exhaustive. It’s simply an overview of some useful and easy to use solutions which should meet most of your requirements. I have no affiliation with the vendors or their distributors, and would encourage people to shop around before buying.)When you run a home-based business – with one or two computers – the main things you need to protect against are malicious hackers, worms, viruses, hijackers, trojans, spyware, and adware. For most people, the following tools are all you need.Firewall – e.g. Outpost Firewall ProBasically, a firewall stops unwanted stuff getting in. Agnitum Outpost Firewall Pro is powerful and easy to use. You can get it from http://www.agnitum.com/products/outpost/ for USD$39.95. It claims to provide the following protection. Detects and blocks all intrusions by hackers Blocks data theft attempts Operates your computer into stealth mode, making it invisible to intruders Analyzes your inbox and Quarantines Internet worms and viruses Monitors network activity of your PC Protects your children from illegal, inappropriate web sites Provides full access to a thorough history of your connections Preve
    Purpose:

    It was God's business to create the universe and our earth. It is our business to garden the earth and to protect the flora and fauna from harmful activities and pollutants. We probably should spend a lot more time on our business and less time on God's business.

    The Lesson

    Gene:1:1: In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

    Gene:1:2: And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness [was] upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

    Gene:1:11: And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, [and] the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed [is] in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.

    Gene:1:12: And the earth brought forth grass, [and] herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed [was] in itself, after his kind: and God saw that [it was] good.

    Gene:1:15: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.

    Gene:1:17: And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,

    Gene:1:20: And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl [that] may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.

    Gene:1:22: And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.

    Gene:1:24: And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

    Gene:1:25: And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that [it was] good.

    Gene:1:26: And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

    Gene:1:28: And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. Gene:1:29: And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which [is] upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which [is] the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.

    Gene:1:30: And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein [there is] life, [I have given] every green herb for meat: and it was so.

    Gene:2:1: Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

    Gene:2:4: These [are] the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,

    Gene:2:5: And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and [there was] not a man to till the ground.

    Gene:2:6: But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.

    The Bible is not a scientific document.

    God did not write the Bible, men did. These men wrote according to the teachings of their times, but with inspiration from God. Their objective was not science but religion: man’s relationship with God.

    Still, the Bible account of the creation is fascinating, isn't it? It is full of insight, right? What the Bible is saying is what it says in the Gospel of John:

    John:1:1: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    John:1:2: The same was in the beginning with God.

    John:1:3: All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

    John:1:4: In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

    John:1:5: And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

    If the Bible were a scientific document, it would contain the technologies used during different times. The object was not to preserve technologies, but to preserve religion. It says that God created all that was created. If we want to know the technologies during various past eras, we have to do what we have been doing for years. DIG!

    The Creation

    Creationism uses science tactics to pursue preset conclusions. It can be more speculative, than scientific. It is a worthwhile pursuit if true scientific arguments are used, as they often are. Stretching science is to be avoided. (Especially in thermodynamics. Some don't seem to know about nonequilibrium thermodynamics, etc.) Accepting truth when proved is integrity.

    Science has not unraveled the creation of the universe in great detail. In fact, the history of science is full of false precepts and conclusions.

    That's what science is all about.

    You take a guess at what you think is right. You call it a hypotheses.

    You test your guess. If lots of data make your guess look good, you call it a theory. You realize that your theory can never be proven, but if more and more data fits, you are happy with the theory. Many theories have held for many years, only to be abandoned when the data (facts) didn't fit.

    Religion also had a history of false precepts and conclusions. Poor Galileo was right in his science but wrong in his religion. He paid dearly for that. The problem is that his church had false precepts about the universe, having thought they knew exactly what God had done. They didn't. They had to change, just as science has to change. Men are not all that smart about everything. They jus

    Personal Bank Loans
    In the present day world, money speaks. It does not only speak, but helps a person to live the way he or she wants. Bank loans have become very common phenomena in the contemporary period in which the world is running on financial capital.Starting from the smallest of families to the biggest of companies and corporate sectors, all require money to make their dream fulfilled, to make a plan work in its own way, or simply to resolve a problem through money. Both nationalized and multinational banks render great support to individuals or groups in lending money for certain purposes. There are various kinds of loans: (a) home loans, (b) personal loans, (c) auto or car loans, (d) educational loans and many others. All banks lend money to individuals and groups. But all this money given out by banks is supposed to be returned back to the bank on a few conditions. The foremost condition is that one has to pay the bank debt in easy payment installments, over a considerable period of time. The monthly money is charged with an additional amount of money based on a percentage of the actual money.Personal bank loans are loans that formally have no definite purpose as, for example, bank auto loans have. This kind of loan is given to an individual on the basis of the fact of his salary. Moreover, he or she has to be a national citizen with the all the necessary documents of identity, salary receipt and such other things. On the verification of the documents produced by the applicant, it is up to the decision of the bank whether to consider the applicant worthy enough to give the personal loan.For example a cooperative bank can give up to $25,000 and that too at a cheap rate as low as 7.2% APR. These loans are payable at the rate that will never change throughout the term of the loan.
    the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl [that] may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.

    Gene:1:22: And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.

    Gene:1:24: And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

    Gene:1:25: And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that [it was] good.

    Gene:1:26: And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

    Gene:1:28: And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. Gene:1:29: And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which [is] upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which [is] the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.

    Gene:1:30: And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein [there is] life, [I have given] every green herb for meat: and it was so.

    Gene:2:1: Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

    Gene:2:4: These [are] the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,

    Gene:2:5: And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and [there was] not a man to till the ground.

    Gene:2:6: But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.

    The Bible is not a scientific document.

    God did not write the Bible, men did. These men wrote according to the teachings of their times, but with inspiration from God. Their objective was not science but religion: man’s relationship with God.

    Still, the Bible account of the creation is fascinating, isn't it? It is full of insight, right? What the Bible is saying is what it says in the Gospel of John:

    John:1:1: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    John:1:2: The same was in the beginning with God.

    John:1:3: All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

    John:1:4: In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

    John:1:5: And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

    If the Bible were a scientific document, it would contain the technologies used during different times. The object was not to preserve technologies, but to preserve religion. It says that God created all that was created. If we want to know the technologies during various past eras, we have to do what we have been doing for years. DIG!

    The Creation

    Creationism uses science tactics to pursue preset conclusions. It can be more speculative, than scientific. It is a worthwhile pursuit if true scientific arguments are used, as they often are. Stretching science is to be avoided. (Especially in thermodynamics. Some don't seem to know about nonequilibrium thermodynamics, etc.) Accepting truth when proved is integrity.

    Science has not unraveled the creation of the universe in great detail. In fact, the history of science is full of false precepts and conclusions.

    That's what science is all about.

    You take a guess at what you think is right. You call it a hypotheses.

    You test your guess. If lots of data make your guess look good, you call it a theory. You realize that your theory can never be proven, but if more and more data fits, you are happy with the theory. Many theories have held for many years, only to be abandoned when the data (facts) didn't fit.

    Religion also had a history of false precepts and conclusions. Poor Galileo was right in his science but wrong in his religion. He paid dearly for that. The problem is that his church had false precepts about the universe, having thought they knew exactly what God had done. They didn't. They had to change, just as science has to change. Men are not all that smart about everything. They ju

    Hairloss - THE Male Nightmare
    Few things life can scare a man as much as losing his hair. No matter how brave the individual might consider himself to be the thoughts of losing his precious locks is enough to strike fear into the hearts of all men. The reality is that well over 85% of men will experience some degree of hairloss during their lifetime. Indeed 90% of all men are destined to experience actual baldness - it's only a matter of time.Why do men fear losing their hair so much? After all is it really that important? That comes down to your own point of view. There's so much emphasis put on hair as a status symbol. From characters in books to musicians and movie stars. Those with the thickest hair are always portrayed as the most popular/sexiest/richest guy around.Conversely if we look at popular entertainment like The Simpsons where the ultimate goofball is a bald guy called Homer. Bald men are seen as something to be ridiculed more so than anything else. Or are they?How much of the stigma attached to male pattern baldness has to do with the feelings of the person involved versus the prejudice of society. Does this prejudice even exist? It may have but this type of social stigma is becoming historical fact as our society evolves and grows in its understanding and acceptance of all types of people and situations.Baldness has become not only acceptable but very chic and fashionable in many places. Bald men are no longer seen as lacking virility - actually quite the opposite. Bald is in and seems set to stay that way for a long time to come.So if baldness is now fashionable why do so many men continue to hide themselves under truly terrible hairpieces? Why do many men suffer the excruciating pain of botched hair transplants? Again this comes down to the individuals perception of their own sel
    rth. Gene:1:29: And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which [is] upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which [is] the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.

    Gene:1:30: And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein [there is] life, [I have given] every green herb for meat: and it was so.

    Gene:2:1: Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

    Gene:2:4: These [are] the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,

    Gene:2:5: And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and [there was] not a man to till the ground.

    Gene:2:6: But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.

    The Bible is not a scientific document.

    God did not write the Bible, men did. These men wrote according to the teachings of their times, but with inspiration from God. Their objective was not science but religion: man’s relationship with God.

    Still, the Bible account of the creation is fascinating, isn't it? It is full of insight, right? What the Bible is saying is what it says in the Gospel of John:

    John:1:1: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    John:1:2: The same was in the beginning with God.

    John:1:3: All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

    John:1:4: In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

    John:1:5: And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

    If the Bible were a scientific document, it would contain the technologies used during different times. The object was not to preserve technologies, but to preserve religion. It says that God created all that was created. If we want to know the technologies during various past eras, we have to do what we have been doing for years. DIG!

    The Creation

    Creationism uses science tactics to pursue preset conclusions. It can be more speculative, than scientific. It is a worthwhile pursuit if true scientific arguments are used, as they often are. Stretching science is to be avoided. (Especially in thermodynamics. Some don't seem to know about nonequilibrium thermodynamics, etc.) Accepting truth when proved is integrity.

    Science has not unraveled the creation of the universe in great detail. In fact, the history of science is full of false precepts and conclusions.

    That's what science is all about.

    You take a guess at what you think is right. You call it a hypotheses.

    You test your guess. If lots of data make your guess look good, you call it a theory. You realize that your theory can never be proven, but if more and more data fits, you are happy with the theory. Many theories have held for many years, only to be abandoned when the data (facts) didn't fit.

    Religion also had a history of false precepts and conclusions. Poor Galileo was right in his science but wrong in his religion. He paid dearly for that. The problem is that his church had false precepts about the universe, having thought they knew exactly what God had done. They didn't. They had to change, just as science has to change. Men are not all that smart about everything. They ju

    The First Step To Teaching Your Man To Be a Better Lover
    Many men resist “being taught” by a woman, even their wife or lover. All is not lost, however. With a few upgrades of your own skills, you can teach him a few tricks that will make sexual intimacy more fulfilling for you and, therefore, improve your relationship, both in and out of the bedroom (or wherever else you want to make love together).Step Number One:Know what you like and what you want.If you don’t know what you like or what you want, you will never be able to teach someone else to participate in maximizing your pleasure. If you have not done so already, find time and space to explore your own body’s likes and dislikes.For example: Take a long hot bubble bath and begin to stroke every inch of your skin. Start with your head or with your feet. Avoid genital stroking for now. This is the time to learn about the sensual possibilities of the rest of your body.Note how different parts of your body seem to come alive with sensation as you caress each skin cell. Vary the speed and firmness or lightness of your stroking. Pay attention to your body’s sensations. Take your time. Explore as many of your body parts as possible. Your skin is a magnificently sensuous organ. Find out what it likes.As your stroke yourself, pay attention to the sensations. You will note that some parts of your body, certain skin locations, seem to be directly connected to your clitoris and your vagina. This is a good thing. Enjoy. Even now, you need not move to genital stroking. Continue to enjoy and to explore other body parts and their sensuous possibilities.Be CreativeThe above exercise provides one exploration model for learning what your body likes. You will now have clues about what you might ask for during sexual intimacy. Be creative. Perhaps you will want to use
    m God. Their objective was not science but religion: man’s relationship with God.

    Still, the Bible account of the creation is fascinating, isn't it? It is full of insight, right? What the Bible is saying is what it says in the Gospel of John:

    John:1:1: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    John:1:2: The same was in the beginning with God.

    John:1:3: All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

    John:1:4: In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

    John:1:5: And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

    If the Bible were a scientific document, it would contain the technologies used during different times. The object was not to preserve technologies, but to preserve religion. It says that God created all that was created. If we want to know the technologies during various past eras, we have to do what we have been doing for years. DIG!

    The Creation

    Creationism uses science tactics to pursue preset conclusions. It can be more speculative, than scientific. It is a worthwhile pursuit if true scientific arguments are used, as they often are. Stretching science is to be avoided. (Especially in thermodynamics. Some don't seem to know about nonequilibrium thermodynamics, etc.) Accepting truth when proved is integrity.

    Science has not unraveled the creation of the universe in great detail. In fact, the history of science is full of false precepts and conclusions.

    That's what science is all about.

    You take a guess at what you think is right. You call it a hypotheses.

    You test your guess. If lots of data make your guess look good, you call it a theory. You realize that your theory can never be proven, but if more and more data fits, you are happy with the theory. Many theories have held for many years, only to be abandoned when the data (facts) didn't fit.

    Religion also had a history of false precepts and conclusions. Poor Galileo was right in his science but wrong in his religion. He paid dearly for that. The problem is that his church had false precepts about the universe, having thought they knew exactly what God had done. They didn't. They had to change, just as science has to change. Men are not all that smart about everything. They ju

    Shrinking Other Cultures
    We can be in touch with each other, seeing and understanding events across the globe, establishing a worldwide community in which each section works as part of a harmonious whole. Mankind is thus united in humanity, caring for his world and fellow human beings. If this is the concept, then the contention must be that the world, at this point in history, cannot be said to have progressed very far towards the status of a ‘global village’.As a result, a culture, with shared values develops, in which all members seek to work together for the good of the community and its environment. Looking at the world today, this can hardly be seen to apply. There are too many factors that prevent the realization of McLuhan’s idealized vision, despite the powerful media at our disposal.Assumptions are that computer mediated communication is accessible to all, and that the information available is not value-loaded or derived from any particular cultural norms, such as beliefs in democracy, equality, free speech, material wealth and so forth. These may be described as Western and are out of step with Asian cultures and beliefs. Singapore took steps to limit access to certain Internet information, based on the belief that Western culture is detrimental to Asian moral and social values. Pornography, materialism, politics and Western permissiveness as a whole were unwelcome, therefore the global village concept of a community with similar access and values is not universal.Accepting other cultures and beliefs, in the spirit of interdependence and common goals, is not yet part of our world.
    ic arguments are used, as they often are. Stretching science is to be avoided. (Especially in thermodynamics. Some don't seem to know about nonequilibrium thermodynamics, etc.) Accepting truth when proved is integrity.

    Science has not unraveled the creation of the universe in great detail. In fact, the history of science is full of false precepts and conclusions.

    That's what science is all about.

    You take a guess at what you think is right. You call it a hypotheses.

    You test your guess. If lots of data make your guess look good, you call it a theory. You realize that your theory can never be proven, but if more and more data fits, you are happy with the theory. Many theories have held for many years, only to be abandoned when the data (facts) didn't fit.

    Religion also had a history of false precepts and conclusions. Poor Galileo was right in his science but wrong in his religion. He paid dearly for that. The problem is that his church had false precepts about the universe, having thought they knew exactly what God had done. They didn't. They had to change, just as science has to change. Men are not all that smart about everything. They just think they are.

    The Bible implies that the universe was created from nothing. My correspondence with one of Dr. Stephen Hawking’s (A Short History of Time) graduate students informed me that the Big Bang theory indicates that the universe was created from nothing and everywhere at once.

    Dr. Henry J. Eyring, the noted physical chemist (Absolute Reaction Rate theory), pointed out that the Biblical sequence of events for the creation are in substantial agreement with the geological record.

    During the Millennium, we will see how God created the universe and how long it took the earth to develop to a livable state for man. Until then, keep thinking and studying, but don't be surprised if you learn that no earthling had the slightest idea of what really went on.

    God's ways are not man's ways, so says the Bible.

    Man's ways are so far from God's ways that he had to set up an advocate for man. Jesus Christ is the advocate. We can't return to God except through him. We can't have eternal life unless we know God. We have to try to become like Him. So it's okay to use our heads and think about important things. The more we learn the better. But don't let your own learning and the misinterpretations of men cost you your faith in God.

    Science has not proved or disproved God

    That is not the purpose of science.

    Religion has not proved God

    Religion is based on faith. But faith is based on the reality of things.

    God has proved Himself by leaving His fingerprints: His creations. He exists and it doesn't matter what any human thinks on the matter. Deciding that God doesn't exist does not make God disappear. And God rules and acts by His laws and will not behave according to what men want, but what He knows is right.

    How are things created?

    There are two ways to create.

    One is by evolution. Darwin was one of the first such thinkers. He listed many problems with his theory, which some followers have chosen to ignore but not the “Intelligent Divine” generation of Creationist. Many modifications have been made to his theory over time. But we know that his finches changed down in the Galapagos Islands to survive. So far, however, they have remained finches. It's like dogs. All dogs are from the same original species, but they are still dogs and can interbreed with each other.

    Men are great evolutionary designers. Look at the automobile, the airplane, the telephone, almost anything you look at has been designed by evolution after the original innovation. However, some do not allow God to design by evolution after His innovations. Why?

    The other way to create, as we have mentioned above, is by innovation. Edison invented the light bulb by innovation. General Electric and other companies have been improving the light bulb for years, creating many new products. That is evolution. The Big Bang was innovation. What happened after that?

    Science says, Evolution! (Well, not all scientist)

    The Creationist / Intelligent Divine group say, Innovation! (Well, perhaps very rapid evolution.)

    Men create by both innovation and evolution. Why restrict God? We are God's children and we have many of His traits. (We lack many of His traits.) God can create as He sees fit. He is not restricted by what men think.

    Does he pop you out as a perfect being? Innovation?

    Or does he pop you out after a nine month transition from a zygote to a baby in a helpless state that requires years of nourishing and training by your parents, and others, before you can reproduce yourself, and many more years before you develop a substantial number of His traits? Evolution?

    Some may think that the creation of a baby is high speed evolution. What do you think?

    We don't know what God did because we either were not around to watch or our spirits can't remember such things in our present state. So why make such a big deal about the conflicts of science and religion? True science and true religion is simply knowing the truth. Why tie God down to man's invented time scale with its limitations?

    Christ said that God could make Sons of Abraham out of stones. I would assume that He could create a 4.5 billion-year-old earth with a snap of his fingers if He wanted to. He also could take 4.5 billion years if He so desired.

    What is the truth?

    Truth is how things were in the past. How things are right now. How things will be in the future. God sees it all. We don't. Be we are promised that we will know in His good time. That should be good enough for most of us. (I’m not saying that we shouldn’t be trying to figure out what He did.)

    Why not spend more time loving each other? What's the

    HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
    <a href="http://www.hubyou.info/article/301709/hubyou-Lessons-for-Life--THE-CREATION.html">Lessons for Life: THE CREATION</a>

    BB link (for phorums):
    [url=http://www.hubyou.info/article/301709/hubyou-Lessons-for-Life--THE-CREATION.html]Lessons for Life: THE CREATION[/url]

    Related Articles:

    Start an Emergency Reserve

    If You Don't Track Your Diet... You Are Wasting Your Time

    Why Me?

    Bookmark it: del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com netvouz.com google.com yahoo.com technorati.com furl.net bloglines.com socialdust.com ma.gnolia.com newsvine.com slashdot.org simpy.com shadows.com blinklist.com