Tags |
|
|
Links |
|
|
Answer Upon - DXInOne - Issue #3 - Which Comes First - The Chicken or the Egg?
I am not going to describe what a product feed (or a data-feed) is. There is a lot of information out there about how to use one to build sites. Instead, I want to talk about how you can actually make more sales with data-feed sites.The program that I manage offers a product feed, and I get a chance to see a sad picture of many good affiliates wasting their potential.Here is my advice from the affiliate manager's perspective.Whenever you join (or think bout joining) a program, you need to look for two things:- Temporary or permanent opportunities- Flaws of a merchantHere is an example of an opportunity that was created by an outside factor.Recently, we got removed from the Yahoo index because of a penalty. I have no idea when (or if) we will get included back in, but I do know that it makes one decision much easier for our affiliates.Judging by the numerous posts on various SEO-related message boards, it looks like G
In that context, the issue is rather interesting.
Interesting Issue
It becomes more of a question along these lines:
If we assume that you are not ‘afraid’ of the system generally, because you know enough to realize what makes it slow and quicken, then you must realize that what you choose to InXchange and what you are waiting for to be OutXchanged are entirely unrelated.
All too often, folks feel that the money they receive from OutXchanges is a
Influence is a key element in mastering the techniques of Magnetic Persuasion. Influence is the highest form of persuasion. With influence, people are spurred on to action because of your character, not your maneuvers. Persuasion is what you do or say, but influence is who you are.How does one gain this type of influence? How do you gain a strong enough influence over people that they will act simply because an idea came from you? How about having a strong enough influence over people that they are still compelled to move forward even when you’re not around?Presence is the ability to empower and influence others into believing in you, trusting in you, and jumping on the bandwagon. You give them the energy they need to bring to pass the results you want. You help them see themselves in the future carrying out your vision. They become excited and energized by your passion and enthusiasm. They are magnetized and motivated by your chari
The title of this entry: ‘which comes first…’ is really meant to mean this:
Does marketing precede system fluidity, or does system fluidity precede marketing?
We will address it in another form – something you often hear, read, or perhaps even feel yourself:
“I will think about adding more money when some of my OutXchanges are processed.”
As we learned in the last entry, this is an incorrect way of thinking through what is happening. We could rephrase the question to something more appropriate:
“When the reserves added by marketing’s efforts to bring more revenues becomes enough for at least one of my OutXchanges to be processed, then I will receive money. I might add more funds.”
The idea here is to realize that what is REALLY being said is along these lines:
“When others market, so new money (reserves) comes in, then as enough new reserves are added, my own OutXchanges will be processed in turn. I will then receive at least one OutXchange out of those fresh reserves. When I do receive that OutXchange (or more than one), then the reserves will be depleted until/unless I decide to add some more money to replace, in part or full, that amount of depleted reserves.”
If we view the statement in that way, then we see two issues emerge quickly.
The two main issues
a) If you are allowed to consider keeping out (or returning) reserves used to process your own OutXchanges, then others are allowed to consider this as well (and they will). This is fine, of course, but the system has to control some of that volatility. They need to do that by ensuring that OA/DXD fees are paid from IB at least most of the time, by absolutely everyone who is able to list OutXchanges. The system is not based on ‘cycling’ same funds, though that is possible whenever marketing is moving along well enough (there is far more e-currency/currency reserves than DXG available, system-wide).
b) More importantly, we are back to the ‘which comes first’ argument.
It is easy to imagine that marketing is moving along, drawing fresh subscribers to the system who are eager to get going and build up their holdings, etc. But CAN marketing do that well when the system is NOT already fluid…?
No; not really. Marketing is slowed to a crawl when the system is slow. Marketing finds it very, very hard to draw new subscribers during slow periods; perhaps only 5% of the usual number of new subscribers is reachable. At that rate, according to the 2005 standards, it would take about 20 months to accomplish what normally can be done within any single month during regular operational speeds.
So, when thinking about that… it means that you are waiting up to 20 months or so to be able to receive OutXchanges, before you decide to add fresh funds (and really, you are not considering adding fresh funds at all if your OutXchanges are being processed before you return some amount out of that total back into the system, such as only 50% or 25%, etc).
In that context, the issue is rather interesting.
Interesting Issue
It becomes more of a question along these lines:
If we assume that you are not ‘afraid’ of the system generally, because you know enough to realize what makes it slow and quicken, then you must realize that what you choose to InXchange and what you are waiting for to be OutXchanged are entirely unrelated.
All too often, folks feel that the money they receive from OutXchanges is a
“Why reinvent the wheel?” your boss may ask. “Use a template instead. We’re running a little behind schedule, and we need that thing up right now.”These lines may irritate many creative workers. But the fact still rings true. You do not have to reinvent the wheel. If a template exists build on it.Remember that your creativity is not stifled by templates. In fact, they provide a basis for your creativity by freeing you from the tedium of organizing the needed structure. You can now focus on content instead!However you still have to be careful of your use of templates. The improper use of such will definitely make your work substandard. Here are a few tips to help you avoid this occurrence.Choose the Right TemplateChoose the right template for your work. To accomplish this you must have a clear understanding of the output you wish to achieve. After this, choose a template that outlines or resembles that output you visualize. Using such a t
The idea here is to realize that what is REALLY being said is along these lines:
“When others market, so new money (reserves) comes in, then as enough new reserves are added, my own OutXchanges will be processed in turn. I will then receive at least one OutXchange out of those fresh reserves. When I do receive that OutXchange (or more than one), then the reserves will be depleted until/unless I decide to add some more money to replace, in part or full, that amount of depleted reserves.”
If we view the statement in that way, then we see two issues emerge quickly.
The two main issues
a) If you are allowed to consider keeping out (or returning) reserves used to process your own OutXchanges, then others are allowed to consider this as well (and they will). This is fine, of course, but the system has to control some of that volatility. They need to do that by ensuring that OA/DXD fees are paid from IB at least most of the time, by absolutely everyone who is able to list OutXchanges. The system is not based on ‘cycling’ same funds, though that is possible whenever marketing is moving along well enough (there is far more e-currency/currency reserves than DXG available, system-wide).
b) More importantly, we are back to the ‘which comes first’ argument.
It is easy to imagine that marketing is moving along, drawing fresh subscribers to the system who are eager to get going and build up their holdings, etc. But CAN marketing do that well when the system is NOT already fluid…?
No; not really. Marketing is slowed to a crawl when the system is slow. Marketing finds it very, very hard to draw new subscribers during slow periods; perhaps only 5% of the usual number of new subscribers is reachable. At that rate, according to the 2005 standards, it would take about 20 months to accomplish what normally can be done within any single month during regular operational speeds.
So, when thinking about that… it means that you are waiting up to 20 months or so to be able to receive OutXchanges, before you decide to add fresh funds (and really, you are not considering adding fresh funds at all if your OutXchanges are being processed before you return some amount out of that total back into the system, such as only 50% or 25%, etc).
In that context, the issue is rather interesting.
Interesting Issue
It becomes more of a question along these lines:
If we assume that you are not ‘afraid’ of the system generally, because you know enough to realize what makes it slow and quicken, then you must realize that what you choose to InXchange and what you are waiting for to be OutXchanged are entirely unrelated.
All too often, folks feel that the money they receive from OutXchanges is a
The web 2.0 movement is certainly mainstream at this point. A quick look at the VC investment data shows that this is no longer a fringe movement. Having lived through the dot-com experience, running an Internet start-up at the time (which made it through to this day), I have a few observations about this latest craze.The number one objection I have to Web 2.0 is the lack of definition for the term itself. Whenever there is a "buzz" about something people can't quite define, I tend to believe it's not real. Or at least, the idea is still in a formation stage. We heard this in the 90's, "the Internet is changing the very fundamentals of business." But when you asked people how, they couldn't really answer. Their only reply was: "You'll see." Well, we certainly saw. Business is business, and always will be. There needs to be a return of x percent in y years, or investments generally are not offered.Will Web 2.0 bring new and interesting ways to make money? I t
b) More importantly, we are back to the ‘which comes first’ argument.
It is easy to imagine that marketing is moving along, drawing fresh subscribers to the system who are eager to get going and build up their holdings, etc. But CAN marketing do that well when the system is NOT already fluid…?
No; not really. Marketing is slowed to a crawl when the system is slow. Marketing finds it very, very hard to draw new subscribers during slow periods; perhaps only 5% of the usual number of new subscribers is reachable. At that rate, according to the 2005 standards, it would take about 20 months to accomplish what normally can be done within any single month during regular operational speeds.
So, when thinking about that… it means that you are waiting up to 20 months or so to be able to receive OutXchanges, before you decide to add fresh funds (and really, you are not considering adding fresh funds at all if your OutXchanges are being processed before you return some amount out of that total back into the system, such as only 50% or 25%, etc).
In that context, the issue is rather interesting.
Interesting Issue
It becomes more of a question along these lines:
If we assume that you are not ‘afraid’ of the system generally, because you know enough to realize what makes it slow and quicken, then you must realize that what you choose to InXchange and what you are waiting for to be OutXchanged are entirely unrelated.
All too often, folks feel that the money they receive from OutXchanges is a
There's a dirty little secret about press releases that the media doesn't want you to know. The fact is, most of them travel directly from the sender’s computer to the reporter’s trash box. Or from out of the envelope into the "round file."That's part of the reason reporters don't like to be asked "did you see my press release." They probably did, but they threw it in the trash so they don't remember yours specificially.But you do still need press releases sometimes. (Like, when you have news.) So when you do, remember this.You may already know that every press release has a headline – a short title – and a lead, or first paragraph. What you may not know is that virtually nothing else in your release matters!The job of a release is to attract and pique the reporter to read on. Keep the “head” and the “lead” snappy – and short. Make them compelling, intriguing, and grabbing.(But still true, please. This is no time to emulate a supermarket
No; not really. Marketing is slowed to a crawl when the system is slow. Marketing finds it very, very hard to draw new subscribers during slow periods; perhaps only 5% of the usual number of new subscribers is reachable. At that rate, according to the 2005 standards, it would take about 20 months to accomplish what normally can be done within any single month during regular operational speeds.
So, when thinking about that… it means that you are waiting up to 20 months or so to be able to receive OutXchanges, before you decide to add fresh funds (and really, you are not considering adding fresh funds at all if your OutXchanges are being processed before you return some amount out of that total back into the system, such as only 50% or 25%, etc).
In that context, the issue is rather interesting.
Interesting Issue
It becomes more of a question along these lines:
If we assume that you are not ‘afraid’ of the system generally, because you know enough to realize what makes it slow and quicken, then you must realize that what you choose to InXchange and what you are waiting for to be OutXchanged are entirely unrelated.
All too often, folks feel that the money they receive from OutXchanges is a
Network Marketing can be a very exciting and rewarding business.It is believed that 50% of potentially, highly, successful people never get off the starting mark because of one very lethal weapon that has taking many network marketers out with a single hit.I would like to refer to this as a weapon of mass destruction because of its far reaching effects into the lives of these men and women who had hopes and big dreams before they were fatally hit.REJECTION and the fear of rejection is one of the most common reasons for failure in network marketing. Every human being has the basic need for acceptance and when rejection comes, its effects are like cryptonite to Superman.We all face rejection at some time in our lives. I have faced rejection and have discovered that there is life after rejection. If you have never faced rejection, then just live a little longer.I believe what hurts most is that when entering into this type of business, re
In that context, the issue is rather interesting.
Interesting Issue
It becomes more of a question along these lines:
If we assume that you are not ‘afraid’ of the system generally, because you know enough to realize what makes it slow and quicken, then you must realize that what you choose to InXchange and what you are waiting for to be OutXchanged are entirely unrelated.
All too often, folks feel that the money they receive from OutXchanges is actually some of their own money, BACK. It looks that way: if I had $1000 in E-Gold, and InX’d it, and then later received an OutXchange for $500, then I could well think absent-mindedly that I am staring at $500 of my OWN money, back in my E-Gold account.
And therefore, I am just waiting for the ‘other of my own $500 originally-transmitted dollars from E-Gold’ to be ‘returned’ back into my account.
… Remember: the money you receive from OutXchanges is probably NEVER, EVER the same exact dollars you yourself put into the system. This was generally never the case, and never will be.
So, what ARE the dollars you receive…?
Other peoples’ dollars, which they themselves added to the system.
That assumes that folks are adding money to the system.
And folks generally don’t add money to the system when the system is slow. And marketing basically cannot do anything about that, either.
Waiting for OutXchanges
So really, you can wait for your OutXchanges to happen FIRST, and then do what you would do anyway: InX to your IB to at least cover OA/DXD fees from there if not also buy Digots, or reduce CL, or set up for adsXposed, etc.
But it will cost you a lot more to wait to add funds. You could have been earning in the meantime by InXchanging now. You will get your OutXchanges later anyway, and at least your InX’d funds would have been earning in the meantime. If you just wait for OutXchanges FIRST, then you can have a long, long wait.
Because everyone is generally thinking what you are thinking.
That whole philosophy to how the system operates is FINALLY changing, by the way.
DXInOne is starting to ensure that everyone InX’s on a schedule if they wish to both gain AND to keep their gains as they go.
What does that do?
It sets up what has to happen anyway in order to get the system fluid again: ‘to control volatility at the OUTPUT end of the system, FIRST, volatility must be controlled at the INPUT end.’ That is, we can fix OutX delays by FIRST fixing InXchanging delays.
It cannot work the other way around. Enough has to be InX’d before OutX’s can fly through. Marketing cannot do that if the system is not already fluid enough to ‘sell’ to the public.
So: to answer the ‘which comes first issue’ … you cannot just choose to wait for your own OutXchanges to happen BEFORE you choose to InXchange, because what you are really doing is to say that you will not put in (up to all) of the money you get back UNTIL others ADD MONEY OF THEIR OWN TO THE SYSTEM.
And they will not really do that until…?
Until the system is already fluid.
That means ‘us.’ We are the ones who have to first control the fluidity before the system can become marketable. DXInOne just implemented standards to ensure this happens.
What doe
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
<a href="http://www.hubyou.info/article/61186/hubyou-DXInOne--Issue-3--Which-Comes-First--The-Chicken-or-the-Egg.html">DXInOne - Issue #3 - Which Comes First - The Chicken or the Egg?</a>
BB link (for phorums):
[url=http://www.hubyou.info/article/61186/hubyou-DXInOne--Issue-3--Which-Comes-First--The-Chicken-or-the-Egg.html]DXInOne - Issue #3 - Which Comes First - The Chicken or the Egg?[/url]
Related Articles:
Traffic Exchange And Home Based Business Work
ExplodeYour Business With Money Making Ebooks
Bookmark it:
|